Karunanidhi, Varnashrama Dharma and Brahmanism

Karunanidhi, Varnashrama Dharma and Brahmanism

VEDAPRAKASH

Karunanidhi’s exposition on Varnashrama dharma:  At last, Karunanidhi has accepted his own brand of “Brahmanism” or “Parppaniyam” followed by him. We should thank him for his confession. I used to ask many times why Kshatriyaism, Vaisyaism and Sudraism are not talked about or even whispered about them. It is not that such-isms are accepted but, it should be quite natural that when is accepted or targeted for heinous attacks and propagandist combats, naturally, others have to be considered for discussion.

In his so-called Question-answer Report (dated 18-04-2008)[1], he has responded as follows:

பூணூல் இல்லாததுதான் காரணம்!

கலைஞர் விளக்கம்
கேள்வி: அந்நாள் அமெரிக்க அதிபர் நிக்சன், அண்டை மாநிலத்து முதல்வர் ஹெக்டே இருவர் மீதும் அவர்களே தொலைபேசியை ஒட்டுக் கேட்டதாகக் கிளம்பிய குற்றச்சாட்டு காரணமாகத்தானே பதவியை ராஜினாமா செய்தார்கள் – ஆனால் அந்த வரலாறு தெரியாத சில வரட்டு மதியினர்; இங்கே தமிழகத்தில் இரு அதிகாரிகளுக்கிடையே தொலைபேசிகள் ஒட்டுக் கேட்கப்பட்டதற்காக முதல மைச்சர் ராஜினாமா செய்ய வேண்டுமென்கிறார்களே? இதற்குக் காரணம் என்ன?

கலைஞர்: என் செய்வது, இந்த முதலமைச்சருக்கு முப்பரி நூல் கிடையாதே! இவர் கடவுளின் முகத்தில் பிறந்த சாதியில் பிறந்தவர் அல்லவே – காலில் பிறந்த சாதியில் பிறந்தவரா யிற்றே! அதனால்தான் இந்த முதல்வர் தலைமையில் இந்த ஆட்சியில் அன்றாடம் நடைபெறுகிற அற்புத சாதனைகளை ஒரு சாரார் மூடி மறைத்துவிட்டு; வேண்டுமென்றே திட்ட மிட்டு சில விஷமச் செய்திகளைப் பரப்பி அந்த நெருப்பில் குளிர் காய முனைகிறார்கள். என்ன நடந்தது? எப்படி நடந்தது? யாரால் நடந்தது? என்று விசாரித்து அறிந்து வெளியிட உயர்நீதிமன்ற ஓய்வு பெற்ற நீதிபதியை நியமித் தாலும்; விகடன் கேலி செய்கிறார்! – சில பல ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன்பு ஆந்திரத்து நடிகை, காஞ்சனமாலையின் பேச்சையே டேப் செய்து போட்டுக் காட்டி மிரட்டிய பணிய வைத்த பரம்பரையினர் அல்லவா?

Why he should give his exposition of much ‘hated’ Purusha sukta mantra and giving his exposition of much maligned Varnashrama Dharma confessing that he is a Sudra?

What is the significance of “Three-spun thread”? What exactly, he wanted to convey? If a person has “Three-spun thread”, can he escape from the charges of phone-tapping? Then, the “Three-spun thread” worn Hegde must have been escaped, but caught as per his own statement! Or perhaps, he has own brand of “Three-spun thread” and it is invisible to others! Anyway, only Padhmavathi[2], Dayalu Ammal or Rajathi Ammal can tell the truth[3]. As he wears “Sacred Yellow Shwal”[4], he can wear his own brand of “Three-spun thread”!

Perhaps, he makes others to remember that all can wear the “Three-spun Thread” as prescribed in Manu Smriti.

Hailing from Telugu speaking community, Dhakshinamurthuy alias Muthuvelar Karnanidhi was raised traditionally and he was sporting a tuft on his head. In those days, it is not necessary that only Brahmins should have tuft on their heads, but it was customary that all would have tuft / Kudimi[5] (as called in Tamil) on their heads. He learned Nadhaswaram upto certain level. Even today, he performs Pranayama and practices Yoga. He declares his religion as Hindu in all Government and other forms and applications.

The significance of declaring that “I am a Sudra”: Long back, he had declared that “I am Sudra” and so on. Ironically, when crisis comes or he comes to know that he is going to be out, he takes the weapon of “Shudras”. Earlier, the slogan was “Ulla shudra Atchiyaik Kappom” = “Let us protect the existing the Rule of Shudra”. Now, suddenly, he has implied it, but specifically. In fact, the Communists[6] have accused him of promoting “Varnashrama Dharma”. Of course, the DK too then and there takes the stick to beat him. “He does not belong to the caste that came from the face of God; but born in the caste that came from His feet“, yes that means now, BSO[7] has become SSO, in other words, the social pyramid had different pattern – SSO, VSO, KSO and BSO. V. T. Rajasekhara Shetty used to write[8], “Shudras may hate Brahmins but they love Brahminism“. So Karu loves “Brahminism” of his own brand.

He had a close Parppan-friend S. Viswanathan (SAVI). Once Karunanidhi requested him to search for a “good pappathi” for his nephew’s son for marriage alliance. In deed, Dayanidhi Maran could marry priya on August26, 1994. Priya has been a Brahmin, reportedly a niece of N. Ram, the present editor of the Karu’s favourite “Mount Road Mahavishnu“.

In another occasion also, he declared that his family has all castes – Nadar, Brahmin and so on. So he has become an expert in eugenics[9], just like the European racist experts, who conducted such experiments. There are other stories which are talked about, and all point to this aspect very clearly – eugenics.

In the SUN-group of about 52 companies[10], there have been Brahmins working, particularly, holding important posts. It is ironical to know why the Brahmins should work in such anti-Brahmin Companies or such anti-Brahmin Companies should have Brahmin staff and officers. This aspect has to be studied thoroughly.

Karunanidhi and Jayalalitha: Karunanidhi has been very much disturbed, thrilled or exited, whenever, he used to talk about her. He has used the most derogatory remarks many times right inside and outside TN Assembly as CM or as the DMK head or otherwise, which are well known to be repeated here. Under the guise of attacking her, he has assaulted Brahmin community like anything. Even the matured Moopanar, once commented that, “After all she danced in our function”, was referring to Jayalalitha. After MGR, definitely, his scourge has been against Jayalalitha only. The words and expressions used by him are the most unparliamentarily and cannot be printed with comfort.

“I am not against Brahmins, but against Brahmanism”: This is the usual way of his escapism or justification or even pastime to malign Brahmins. According to their ideological exposition that Brahmanism has been the dominating tendency, sitting at the top and thus controlling other Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and shudras. Therefore, they want to remove such hegemony in the society. Of course, now Brahmins have been almost eliminated from all spheres and they can survive only with their hard work and merit. Just by telling that one is Brahmin, he / she cannot get anything but scoff, insult and injuries. Thus, when Brahmins were not there, who have been dominating has to be checked out. Naturally, one has to look for other categories – Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and shudras. Tamils know that during C. N. Annadurai period, Mudaliars were dominating and M. G. Ramachandra Malayalees.

DMK not against Brahmins says Karunanidhi[11]: The DMK president M. Karunanidhi said that the party had nothing against Brahmins but only opposed Brahminism. This was the policy followed by his mentor, C.N. Annadurai. Briefing presspersons after a meeting of the administrative committee of the party, Karunanidhi refuted AIADMK and Congress charges that he was deliberately whipping up communalism out of frustration in the wake of his party’s rout in the assembly elections held in June 2001.

Answering a question whether there was any difference of opinion between his party and the Dravidian Kazhagam on the establishment of the institute of Vedic sciences and Agama studies in the light of the support extended by Mr.K.Veeramani, Dravidian kazhagam leader, Karunanidhi said the former might have welcome the prospect of Harijans becoming archakas in temples. He did not know whether he had welcomed the proposed institute itself.

Karunanidhi said the former Supreme Court Judge Mahararajan in his report on the subject submitted to the former CM M. G. Ramachandran, in 1972 had said that everyone irrespective of caste or creed could not become a temple archaka unless some amendments to the Constitution were made. He would not agree with the view of some that the unfulfilled wish of E. V. Ramasamy, Dravidar Kazhagam leader, had been accomplished with the present government proposing the institute of Vedic Sciences. Could any Harijan think of becoming an archaka at the Meenakshi Amman temple Madurai or Kanchi Kamakshi Amman temple at Kanchipuram, he asked adding that the Kanchi Sankaracharya himself had expressed his views to the Maharajan Committee that only persons belonging to a particular community could become temple archakas. Thus, in short, his attack had been against Brahmins, though he pretend to argue in his characteristic way.

Moopanar’s criticism: “I have not given any advice to K. K. Mopanar, Congress (I) leader. I am a leader of a party and Mr. Moopanar is giving advice. This is the present political climate in Tamilnadu”. He quipped when a reporter referred to Moopanar’s criticism of the DMK leader’s anti-Brahmin speeches[12] and writings[13] and his suggestion that Karunanidhi either remain in politics or become a social reformer. Here, Moopanar had actually exposed his duplicity, as in reality, neither EVR nor Karunanidhi has not achieved substantially in the abolition of caste system and in fact, casteism increased with uglier tendencies.

The meeting urged the TN government to give up the proposal to establish the Institute of the Vedic Sciences as it would support and encourage Hindu fundamentalism. He never made such remarks, when Urudu University / Academy was proposed and even established.

Attacks on Brahmins: However, one can note the pattern of physical attacks, murderous attempts[14] etc., carried on Brahmins only during his reigns 1969-71, 1971-76, 1989-91, 1996-2001 and now 2005-2008 Just remember the attacks, which I have already pointed out different forums. Can anyone believe that it could not happen so, had he been not CM? Or it happens only because he was / has been CM. Very often, he forgets that he was / is the ruler of crores of people of Tamilnadu, not simply anti-Brahmin CM, non-Brahmin CM or atheist CM and so on. His anti-Brahmin activism is fuelled by the DK by inciting directly and indirectly. DK used to dig and beat him using the anti-Brahmin stick[16] telling that it is better to follow R. Venkatraman than Karunanidhi for the former respects his Teacher – Sankaracharya, whereas, the latter disrespects his teacher – EVR. Of course, Karu used to carry out gimmicks by criticising K. Veeramani for supporting Jayalaltha and so on. Once, he even ordered to arrest T. R. Balu for making anti-Brahmin rhetoric at a Public meeting conducted at Tana Street, Purasawakkam on October 9, 1990. DK interprets it as his soft corner towards Brahminism.

Many cases of Temple priests being attacked with weapons were reported in 2006-2007.

• Gurumurthy (74) was attacked and his sacred thread and kudimi / tuft cut off (April 23, 2007, at Neyveli town).

• The group also gate-crashed into the house of Gnanaskanda Gurukkal (42) and cut off sacred threads of Gnanaskanda Gurukkal, Ganesan Gurukkal, Gopinath Gurukkal and some other Gurukkals ran away.

• Vembu Iyer was attacked and his sacred thread and kudimi / tuft cut off (April 22, 2007, at Big Temple, Tanjore).

• The attack at Ayodhya Mantapam, West Mambalam, Chennai, had been the most heinous one, as not only petrol bombs were hurled but also two innocent Brahmins were attacked with Arival / big knives causing injuries. Incidentally, these people had nothing to do with any incidence.

So why this place and these two poor Brahmins were targeted have been unanswered even today. Though, the Police arrested some persons, no details were made available to understand the motive of the attack.

In 1980s, very similar incidences took place, of course, when Karunanidhi was CM (1989-91). When one reporter Ganapathy of “The Hindu” attacked and his sacred thread was cut, then only, because of the media, it caught the attention of the authorities and such incidences were controlled.

Conclusion: The Dravidian politicians should be subjected thorough critical study and psychoanalysis also, considering their double-think, double-speak, double-act and so on. There have been few critical studies of Dravidian movement and their leaders. P. Ramamurthy[18] (1983), A. R. Venkatachalapathy[19] (1994), Guna[20] (1994) and others have brought out their critical views, but each has limitations, as the respective author has been bound and controlled by his ideological and political affiliation for example over-zealous Tamil chauvinism (including anti-Telugu, anti-Kannada, anti-Malayalam categories), Sri Lankan issue, LTTE-support, anti-Indian, anti-Hindu, anti-Hindi etc.

Of all of them, as Karunanidhi has been living giant of Dravidian ideology, he should be studied carefully. We cannot brush aside just by considering him a senile and so on. Of course, he could always take shelter under such a pretext, if grave problem comes. Otherwise, his utterances have to be taken seriously, that too, when he makes such utterances or statements officially, inside Assembly. Incidentally, after talking all nonsense, and its reports appearing in newspapers and TV, they have indulged in expunging such remarks.

Just for political survival, if he goes on targeting, attacking and torturing physically and mentally one community, it cannot be accepted by any means. Then, there is no difference between him and Hitler. Ironically, this also adversely affect Brahmins, as the comparison of Brahmins with Jews, place them against Mohammedans. Of course, Osama bin Laden has already categorised Hindus as so.

In the caste based violence, only non-Brahmins were involved. Many times, such skirmishes would have been intra-caste and inter-caste violent incidences. However, Brahmins are blamed for such incidences. The Communists and other affiliated groups exhibit posters every central or state government compared with Brahmins for every happening, whether it petrol rise, or price rise in general. This has been so blind but followed by others and no authority questions, controls or prevents it.

---

[1] Reported in today’s newspapers in Chennai.

[2] His first wife is no more and M. K. Muthu was born through her.

[3] As the Tali tied by Harischandra to his wife would be visible only to him, the “Three-spun thread” worn by him must be visible to his wives only. Here also amomg “wives” – Manaivi and Thunaivi have to be differentiated.

[4] About the “Yellow thundu / shawl”, there have been much discussion connecting it with “Kalki Bhagawan”, as reported by Indian Express.

[5] The DK used to shout “Cut off the Kudimi and Punul of the Parppans”.

[6] Arunan, Dravida Iyakkam – Oro Marksiya Ayvu (The Dravidian Movement – a Marxist Point of view), A. Abdul Wahab, 6/16, By-pass Road, Madurai – 18, 1981.[7] The expression BSO – Brahminical Social Order was reportedly used by Kanshiram.

[8] Periyar E. V. Ramswamy, The Salvation to shudra Slavery, Dalit Sahithya Akademy,
Bangalore, 1986, p.ix.

[9] The science of using controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristic in a population.

[10] The fight between Maran brothers and Karunanidhi is just a political stunt and gimmick, as Karunanidhi and his family members have been partners and directors in one or the other way in all the Companies and hence the financial bondage cannot be broken or separated. The Corporate veil has been so strong and it cannot be pierced and seen through!

[11] The Hindu, Wednesday, October 30, 1991, p.3. A report appearing with the same caption.

[12] Karunanidhi made many speeches against Brahmins and Hindu religion, the moment, his party got defeated in 2001 Assembly elections.

[13] In Murasoli, his writings had been as usual with blasphemy. Ironically, the fight between DMK and DK or rather “Udal” is revealed in the Murasoli (DMK mouth piece) and Viduthalai (DK mouth piece).

[14] Last year, innocent Brahmins were attacked with lethal weapons throwing petrol bombs in Ayodhya Mantapam,
West Mambalam, Chennai, in which two Brahmins received sword’s cuts.

[15] Kali. Pungundran, Kalainjaum, Kazhagamum (Kalinjar and Kazhagam or Karunanidhi and DMK), Dravida Kazhaga Publication,
Madras, 1995.

[16] Ibid, p.37.

[17] Ibid, p.46-48

[18] P. Ramamurthy, Ariya Mayaiya? Dravida Mayaiya? Vidhuthai Porum Dravida Iyakkamum (Was it Aryan myth or Dravidian Myth? The Freedom Struggle and the Dravidian Movement, Pazhaniappa Brthers,
Madras, 1983

[19] A. R. Venkatachalapathy, Dravida Iyakkamum Velalarum (The Dravidian Movement and Vellalars), South Asian Books,
Madras, 1994.

[20] Guna, Dravidattal Vizhnthom (We fell because of Dravianism), Tamizhaga ayvaran,
Bangalore, 1994.

Here is a superb article by Vedaprakashji

 

Why Jesus failed again at Eraiyur?

 

The failure at Erayur is serious: As the mass-media flashes news immediately, definitely the Church has been in jitters, nervous and really worried in responding to the violent behaviour of their believers. “Oh God, Oh God, why you have forsaken me?“[1], thus crying the affected believers. Jesus’ assurance[2] that, “You all one in Christ, whether one is black or white, gentile or Jew” has failed utterly, as these believers have decided to fight with each other[3].

Karunanidhi and his Black Parivar aid and abet: Thus, when the Black Parivar, atheist Karunanidhi and others have been creating a lot of tamasha, sensation and excitement exploiting the old-man Arumugaswamy, singing Tevram in Tamil and the advocates getting benefits, the Catholic believers want separate Churches to worship, pray and conduct mass. Can Karunanidji help them? Now, Christians fight with each other to worship the same God, conduct prayers invoking the same God and inviting the Priests-Christian Dikshitas[4] to do so. But the Catholic-Disksithas refuse to come. The Catholic Bishops refuse to recognize their Church built. How that they have TWO to approach ONE[5]? Why Karu does not issue GO in this effect? Why the secular Ruler keep quite or indulging in dereliction in his duty? The Black Parivar too has been keeping quite instead of leading the Scheduled Caste Catholics to their own Church, demanding the Catholic priests to conduct the prayers or select one Arumugaswamy-type Anthonysamy or some other Catholicsamy[6] to lead the march! Had they done so, this clash could have been avoided. The two souls could have been saved.

On March 9, 2008 (Sunday): The faithful Christians clashed with each other in the name of Jesus Christ or Mary, as reported by the TV-channels. Of course, they pointed out that they were Vanniars and Dalits (Scheduled Caste). Ironically, the media continues to use the term “Dalit”, though it has already been announced that it is legally incorrect to use such term.

March 10, 2008 (Monday): Evidently, to suppress their omissions and commissions, the Bishops with their political clout started demanding enquiry, commission and compensation!

Enquiry Commissionand Compensation: Antonio Anandarayar[7] now demands a probe into the police firing at Eraiyur in Viulluppuram district. He also appeals to Karunanidhi to form an inquiry commission, compensation to the kin of the victims of police firing and those injured in the clash.

Vicar General knew the problem three months back: P. Antonisamy, the Vicar General said three months ago, Antonio Anandarayar, of Puducherry and Cuddalore, the Archdiocese had constituted a committee to look into the demands of Dalit Christians of Eraiyur. They had sought permission to conduct mass on Saturday evening and warned the Archdiocese to stop discrimination. Thus, the priest-heads in question know the discrimination very well and it has been perpetuated by them in spite of the converted Christians accusing them.

March 12, 2008 (Wednesday): “Peace Talks” were conducted for four hours under Ponmudi, the Minister[8]. Prajen Tranavnith – the Collector, Kathiravan – the District Revenue Officer, Amalraj – S.P, and other officials participated in the talks. They discussed the issue with the two groups and Christian priests separately. Then, Ponmudi asked all the three groups to sit together and discuss. The discussion lasted for four hours. Then, Ponmudi announced, “The meeting was conducted among the three connected groups – he two groups of Eraiyur and the Christian priest of Puducherry and Caddalore diocese for reaching a consensus that such incidences should not recur in Eraiyur and there should be a peaceful solution to the problem. The two groups – Vanniyars and Scheduled castes categorically asserted that they should have separate Churches for worship. The Christian priests responded that they would take decision after consulting with other priests in this regard during their meeting to be held on 13^th March. Moreover, the Scheduled caste converted Christians have put forward a demand that the Church built by them should be recognized and approved by the diocese. The priests would come to their church and conduct prayers weekly one. The district administration would take decision as for their demand for setting up separate Fair-price shop. After the receipt of the report, the compensation would be granted for the damage” (Viduthalai, Marchh 13, 2008).

March 13, 2008 (Thursday): Indian Catholic responds in its own way as follows. Church leaders appealed for calm after two Catholics were killed and another injured when police fired at clashing groups of Catholics. Father Vincent Chinnadurai, the spokeman for the Tamil Nadu Bishops’ Council told UCA news on March 11, “The clash was “unfortunate and counterwitness[9] to our Church” urging both groups “to reconcile and live amicably“.

Church leaders say the violence stems from alleged caste discrimination. The dalit group in Eraiyur’s Our Lady of the Rosary parish has been demanding a separate parish for their community. The dalit, descendants of low-caste people once called “untouchable,” accuse members of the rival Vanniyar community of neglecting them in the parish. According to the archdiocesan website, the parish was established in the 17th century and has about 10,000 Catholics, making it the biggest in Pondicherry-Cuddalore.

Both feuding groups are considered economically weak, but the Vanniyar place themselves above the dalit in terms of caste. This tussle[10] within the local Catholic community is centuries old, Church people say.

The latest flare-up began when some dalit Catholics went on a fast, demanding that Archbishop Anthony Anandarayar of Pondicherry-Cuddalore recognize a building they had already built as their parish church, dedicated to Our Lady of Perpetual Help. The group wanted the archbishop to officially declare it a parish and send a priest there. They also reportedly demanded the closure of the original parish.

Police told media the demands of the “fasting group” infuriated the Vanniyar people, some 500 of whom attacked a dalit settlement and burned about 30 huts. Media reported that when police baton-charged the mob to disperse it, people responded by throwing stones that injured a few policemen. The police then opened fire. Two members of the Vanniyar community died as a result, and a third was injured.

According to Archbishop Peter Fernando of Madurai, president of the Tamil Nadu Bishops’ Council, another 40 people were injured in the fighting between the dalit and Vanniyar, and have received medical treatment.

The bishops “are saddened by this incident,” he told UCA News. “We urge both communities to restrain from violence.”

The regional bishops’ council will look at such caste problems “more seriously and would try” to find some lasting solutions, Archbishop Fernando said.

Although caste clashes are not unusual in the state, this was the first time Catholics were killed in such clashes, and mainstream media have widely reported this violence.

The above details are from the website: http://www.theindiancatholic.com/report.asp?nid=10324 with emphasis added for the context.

The Revelations: The response of the Church, the Church leaders and of course, the “clashed and clashing Catholics” expose or reveal many interesting details about the utter failure of Jesus Christ in India [Note, we do not have anything against Jesus or Christ, but the way the missionaries convert Hindus, make them fight with each other and make money[11] by them is condemned and criticized].

V Acccording to P. Antonisamy, the Vicar General, it is three months problem or he knws it, as he said three months ago, Antonio Anandarayar, of Puducherry and Cuddalore, the Archdiocese had constituted a committee to look into the demands of Dalit Christians of Eraiyur.

V But UCAN asserts that, “This tussle within the local Catholic community is centuries old, Church people say.” That is from 17^th century onwards, they have been struggling but they could not remove the caste! What a wonderful theological experiment[12] in deed in India in the names of Jesus Christ!

V Why the so-called “alleged caste discrimination.” Exists in the Church? Why alleged, the same Christians have written millions of books accepting the caste, race and other discriminations existing within Christianity! Even the in the newspapers, they seek brides and grooms only with caste affiliation instead of Jesus or Mary[13].

V Why the so-called dalit group in Eraiyur’s Our Lady of the Rosary parish has been demanding a separate parish for their community? The DRC has already implemented separate Churches and therefore, there is nothing wrong in allowing them each group to have a Church[14].

V Why they should accuse members of the rival Vanniyar community of neglecting them in the parish?

V Why Church built by Scheduled caste Christians is not recognized?

V What is the delay or role of Archbishop Anthony Anandarayar of Pondicherry-Cuddalore here?

V Why they resort to a fast, demanding that Archbishop Anthony Anandarayar of Pondicherry-Cuddalore recognize a building they had already built as their parish church?

V Why they should have wanted the archbishop to officially declare it a parish and send a priest there?

V Why they should have also reportedly demanded the closure of the original parish, which belongs to the 17^th century as per their website[15]?.

V Why the non-violent method of and the demands of the “fasting group” infuriated the Vanniyar people?

V Why the Counter-Catholic groups should have, some 500 of whom attacked a dalit settlement and burned about 30 huts?

V If “The clash was “unfortunate and counterwitness to our Church” urging both groups “to reconcile and live amicably“, it clearly proves that the Church could not produce any effective witness so far.

V The Jesus also could not make them “to reconcile and live amicably“, in spite of their acceptance of Christ. Why then, Jesus should have failed?

V Ironically, intriguingly and interestingly, the so-called “Black Bishop”, the “Dalit-Bishop”, etc., Ezra Shargunam has been keeping quite! It is inexplicable.

Hindus are concerned about the Catholic clashes: Ultimately, the most affected party has been the Hindus. The Catholics could right royally claim that their Catholic believers fight with each other, but what about the non-Catholics? They have been fishing in troubling waters by converting these failed souls to Protestant, Seventh Day Adventists and other denominations with huge amount of dollars pouring from USA, Germany and other countries through their TNCs, Foundations and affiliated NGOs. The more such intra and inter conversions[16] take place, there would be more theological, lityrgical and other clashes leading to or resulting in physical clashes. Unfortunately, the Black Parivar and Red Parivar groups collude with these groups. As for as the anti-Hindu tirade is concerned, they may be very happy, but considering the implications, the Christians have to be dealing, associating and hobnobbing with them. Hindus, thus get more nuisance, problems and issues, as these groups would ideologically attack them as scapegoat. These Blacksheep attack the Hindu scapegoats and enjoy the benefits together politically, financially and in other aspects. As people come to know the facts, they also start questioning and that is why more and more Christians are getting into the crimes of murders, rape, misappropriation of funds, cheating and so on. Therefore, the Hindus should be vigilant and try to advice the Christians to be careful in their approach and dealings.

VEDAPRAKASH

14-03-2008

---

[1] This is the last cry of Jesus Christ leaving his spirit on the cross according to Bibles. E.g, Matthew 27.40.

[2] This is also famous Biblical quotation often used by the Christian propagandists to prove the equality of believers before their God in their religion.

[3] Perhaps, they have decided to carry the sword, as Jesus warned, “Do not think that I have come here to bring peace, but sword” (Matthew 11.33). The verse.35 may be appropriate here, as brothers fight with each other! So perhaps, the bible works differently in India!.

[4] One need not be worried about the usage of “Dikshithars” with them, as they have already all such paraphernalia – samis, Swamys, Iyers, Rayars, etc, You can note one Rayar in the context.

[5] This just to provoke them as they used to claim that whether it is THREE or ONE, it is only THREE-in-One and ONE-in-THREE!

[6] Inculturation under Vatican Council – II approve everything.

[7] Is he a convert from Madhwa Brahmin group or simply he has such names to fool others or to show off his superiority? Only Jesus knows.

[8] How the atheist Ministers work promptly in this case, wheres, they were sleeping in the case of “singing Tevaram in Tamil”. Even the Minster for HR & CE did not care.

[9] This is dangerous, ass they cannot incite violence and reap harvest. All have been witnessing what Christians have been doing in India.

[10] Refer to my article, “Why Pope follows two ways in the name of God….”.

[11] Matthew 7.24, ye cannot serve God and mammon!

[12] When such theological experiments fail, they should realize that they are wrong. If the Hindus are really fools, all should have become during the reign of the British or the moment Xavier implemented inquisition or at least during the Mohammedan rule to their religion. But this has not happened.

[13] Let them first worry about this hypocrisy, then they can blame others for all other social aberrations etc. The western media has been also closing their eyes with all their professionalism.

[14] It is better to get cured before it turns out to be fatal.

[15] See, they do not forget their promotion of “Church History” in spite of killing and suffering!

[16] It is not a problem for Catholics, but for Indians and Hindus. The irony is being a Christian, why they should be again and again converted? Is the God changed is not effective or the God is also changed? They should reveal about their position of God to the gullible Hindus as to who is the God – Jehovah, Mary, Jesus or Christ? Why then, they fight with Hindus for monotheism, pantheism and so on?

Atheist outfits and pseudo seularists harass Dhikshithars

BJP hits out at temple clash

Madurai, March 04 The Tamil Nadu unit of the Bharathiya Janata Party (BJP) today strongly condemned the lathi charge in the Sri Natarajar temple at Chidambaram and demanded stern action against the officials responsible for the violence.

Talking to newspersons here, BJP State Vice President Pon Radhakrishnan wondered why members of Dalit Panthers of India (DPI), Peoples Art and Literary Association (PALA) and Dravidar Kazhagam, besides Muslims, who were in no way connected with the temple, were allowed inside the holy place to indulge in goondaism. The Government should not have allowed the atheists inside the temple complex and create problem.

He pointed out that there was no ban on singing ‘thevaram’ or ‘Tthiruvasagam’ in the sanctum sanctorum even now, during the rituals. He asked, why should ”Manitha Urimai Pathukappu Kazhagam” (Human Rights Protection Association) and other non-Hindu organisations should be allowed to interfere.

The problem should have been sorted out through talks and what the Government did was shabby, allowing the temple complex to turn into a battle ground, he alleged. On the Sethu issue, he strongly condemned the Centre’s move to tell the apex court that the Ramar Sethu was not man-made, but a natural formation. He accused that the Centre had taken the move only to satisfy the minorities.

The recent happenings at the Thillai Nataraja Temple, Chidambaram has certainly taken place because of some unwanted elements, masquerading as protectors of Tamils.

When there was a problem of evangelism in Tirumala, HH Shri Pejawar Swamiji along with HH Swami Dayananda Saraswathiji and the Kanchi Acharya decided on the fact finding mission under Justice Bhikshapati, which did yeomen service to the Hindus and ensured that the entire area is retrieved and protected from the Sam inspired evangelism.

I sincerely felt that a similar exercise is the need of the hour at Chidambaram and I am very happy to announce that
Dr Subramanian Swamy has once again taken the lead in the protection of Hindu Dharma and has constituted a fact finding team to visit Chidambaram and to set things right there.

Following is the Press Statement released by Dr Swamy today:

It has been decided to send a fact finding team of eminent persons to Chidambaram Nataraja temple to determine who is behind the anti-Hindu violence and debasement of the Dikshitar in the temple, and recommend appropriate follow up action to bring the miscreants to book and account.

Besides myself, the team will consist of international Working President of VHP Mr. S. Vedantam, former Cuddalore Collector and TN JP President Ms.V.S.Chandralekha, IAS (Retd) and Mr. V. Sundaram, IAS Retd.) and two others .

(Subramanian Swamy)

Watch this video presentation on the lifestyles of Dikshidars. How this community has dedicated its life to the service of God! Now it is being taunted!

Pray Lord Nataraja for their safety and security!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2856124865423062308&q=Chidambaram&total=154&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Hello world!

I have started this blog to voice the aspiration, concerns and even grudges of Tamil Brahmins. We have had a glorious past and are sure to have a marvellous future.

After seeing that the Brahmins are maligned by athiests, Christians,  cripto communists and pseudo secularists I felt the need for a website to air our view point unmolested. So here we are!

Because of our astonishing ability as a community we Tamil Brahmins have been despised by those who couldn’t compete with us on a level plane. They have indulged in racism and discrimination to run roughshod over our community using number game. They also set up agent provocateurs and fifth columns within the community. But they will never succeed for intelligence would be victorious over stupidity!

Janamejayan